News and opinions on the situation in Venezuela
 
9/7/05

Chavez Frias not losing much sleep over the USA’s intent to “punish” Venezuela

  

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=45153

VHeadline.com commentarist Oscar Heck writes:  On Sunday August 7, 2005, after Chavez voted, he gave a press conference. Some reporters asked ridiculous questions, particularly one reporter from the BBC and one from El Universal, one of Venezuela’s most anti-Chavez newspapers. I don’t know how Chavez does it … to have the patience to answer people who ask senseless and absurd questions, as though they were being “so smart,” but in fact, making fools out of themselves.

Anyhow, one of the questions led to Chavez speaking about Venezuela’s timely divorce with the DEA (US Drug Enforcement Agency).

According to an August 8, 2005 Vheadline.com article,  “The President argues that it all boils down to a matter of national sovereign … ‘we have been checking up and it appears that the DEA was using the war on narco-trafficking to support narco-trafficking even and undertake intelligence work against the Venezuelan government’ … Hitting out at the USA, Chavez Frias maintains that it is the biggest world consumer of drugs accusing its government and institutions of doing little to stop consumption, despite having the mighty CIA and other intelligence organs.”

I agree 100% with Chavez. 

I believe that the DEA and other US-based organizations such as USAID, the American Center for International Labor Solidarity, the Center for International Private Enterprise, the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs are fronts for the CIA … and that a part of the CIA’s job is to assure that 1) drug exports to the USA are not halted 2) that this drug trade is controlled by the US government.

Consider the following:

1. Why is it that the biggest consumer of “illicit” drugs is the USA?

2. If the USA considers itself to be an “expert” in “intelligence” work and law enforcement, why then doesn’t it curb the consumption of drugs within their own country, or thwart the networks which deliver and distribute the drugs within their own country?

3. US culture is based on the “value” of capitalism. One of the many definitions of “capitalism” is: dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=11285&dict=CALD An economic, political and social system based on private ownership of property, business and industry, and directed towards making the greatest possible profits for successful organizations and people.  US culture spans government, businesses, institutions, child-rearing, education, health-care, law, the application of justice, religion and almost all aspects of life, including the criminal sectors … thus capitalism spans all the above. If the drug trade is one of the most profitable industries (perhaps, apart from the oil trade and weapons manufacturing), then it is highly probable that the drug trade is a business which must be kept alive in order to guarantee present and future profits for its investors. Note that the above definition of capitalism states, “directed towards making the greatest possible profits.” What better way is there to make “the greatest possible profits?”

4. The possible reasons to not slow or halt the drug trade are based on profits. Human life and the well-being of people is secondary to profits … as is clearly witnessed by the fact that there exists a massive capitalist military-contracts industry, headed principally by the USA. Thus, the well-being of US citizens is secondary to the massive profits which are made by allowing the drug business to thrive and to proliferate.

5. The USA has another highly profitable business venture … privately-operated prisons. If there are not enough “criminals” to fill jails, then this business will go belly up. Thus, the jails must be filled … principally with darker-skinned US citizens who are caught with a gram or two of US-government-provided crack cocaine (per capita, how many whiter-skinned cocaine-consuming business executives, lawyers, doctors, or politicians are presently in US jails?). I say US-provided because I believe that the US government is deeply involved in assuring that the drug trade continues to exist.

6. The US government has spent an estimated $3.3 billion on Plan Colombia, the US-led pretend-”war” on drugs in the Andean region of South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru, Venezuela). $3.3 billion of US tax payers’ money represents about $10 per US citizen. Why is the US government not using this money to educate its own people about drugs, or to build rehab/aid centers? $.3.3 billion is a lot of money. If the US government spent all this money in operating drug rehab/aid centers, it could have operated 66 rehab/aid units per state (at about $330,000 each per year over 3 years) … or a total of 3300 drug rehab/aid centers throughout the country. If each center treated or aided 20 people per day over a 3 year period they would have treated/aided about 72 million US citizens! More astonishingly, if the US government had used this money for a national televised campaign against the use of drugs and if every minute of airtime cost $500, the US government could have aired 10 one-minute spots every day in every one of the 50 states for a period of about 36 years!!! ($3,300,000,000 $500/minute 50 states 10 minutes air time/day 365 days). So, does it really make sense for the US government to spend $3.3 billion of taxpayers’ money on Plan Colombia?

7. Another factor to consider is that portions of Plan Colombia are probably implemented by “special forces.” If anyone has met special forces people, one will know that most of these people are mercenaries, mostly sociopaths who are bloodthirsty and who have little or no conscience. Most of them work for the fun of it (killing people) and for the money (lots of it). Most are extremely dangerous people and many of them would sell their own mothers for a few dollars. I have met several of these people in Kuwait during the Gulf War, in Egypt and in Canada, where some of them hide after their time in service has expired. If these special forces people are exposed to the possibility of making massive amounts of money by working within the drug trade, they will … and guess where their best customers are?

8. Now, consider the following. The US government is capable of stopping an army like that of Saddam Hussein’s, yet it “cannot” stop the influx of “illegals” from Mexico and Central America. Why is this? In my view, and in many people’s views, it is because it is economically feasible to let them into the country. They provide the cheap slave-labor to US manufacturers and agricultural producers. It increases profits, thus contributing to the enhancement of the capitalist US economy. This is what capitalism is all about, profits. So, if the US government is capable of not stopping the “invasion” of “illegals” coming into the USA for reasons of profit, then it is highly probable that the US government is taking exactly the same approach with drugs coming into the USA.  It is a matter of profits. It is not about the welfare of US citizens. If it were, the US government would stop the flow of “illegals” so as to protect US citizens from the massive manufacturing and agriculture job losses which they are experiencing today. Also, consider the massive profits which are made by the millions of middlemen in the drug industry within US territory.

9. There is another reason why the “war” on drugs is a sham. The US government needs to desensitize as many US citizens as possible. One method is to brainwash them through television, news, etc. Another method is to make them work hard so that they have as little time as possible to think for themselves. Additionally, another tactic is to provide people with drugs such as cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, prescription drugs etc. in order to keep as many people as possible “comfortably numb,” as the Pink Floyd song says. This numbness keeps the majority of people quiet, indifferent and easily brainwashable. These are tactics which are typically used by cult leaders in order to control their flocks.

So, why stop the drug trade?

A person on a web page called “Colombia Guide” states it quite well:
“Raising the troop cap in www.poorbuthappy.com/colombia/node/5020 Colombia is just wrong. Plan Colombia and the so-called war on drugs is just another way to control another country. In my opinion the 3.3 billion (or even a part of it) should be used for humanitarian purposes in Colombia and to help those addicted here in the U.S. Cut off the demand for drugs, and watch the supply dwindle. Fumigating people, land, and animals doesn’t stop anything, it only hurts the people. Hasn’t the government learned anything from Peru and the balloon effect? And from what I have learned over the years, Bush appears to me to be anti-Latin America overall (most recent: Cuba and Venezuela. Bush and his people have made it very dangerous to be an American abroad.”

The DEA’s mission statement says (amongst other things):
“The mission of the www.usdoj.gov/dea/agency/mission.htm Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is to enforce the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States and bring to the criminal and civil justice system of the United States, or any other competent jurisdiction, those organizations and principal members of organizations, involved in the growing, manufacture, or distribution of controlled substances appearing in or destined for illicit traffic in the United States …”

Note the arrogance:
“… is to enforce the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States …”

The DEA’s mission statement continues (my comments in parenthesis):

“In carrying out its mission as the agency responsible for enforcing the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States, the DEA’s primary responsibilities include:” 

“Investigation and preparation for the prosecution of major violators of controlled substance laws operating at interstate and international levels.” (Major violators like the US military, which continues to use a Napalm-equivalent?)

“Investigation and preparation for prosecution of criminals and drug gangs who perpetrate violence in our communities and terrorize citizens through fear and intimidation.” (Criminals like the US military and its leaders — Bush and Condoleezza included — which continue to terrorize Iraqi and Afghani citizens and which continue to perpetrate violence?)

“Management of a national drug intelligence program in cooperation with federal, state, local, and foreign officials to collect, analyze, and disseminate strategic and operational drug intelligence information.” (Strategic “intelligence” like the intelligence which determined that Saddam Hussein had weapons of “mass destruction,” thus justifying the assassination and the maiming of thousands of innocent Iraqi women and children and the almost total destruction of the Iraqi people’s infrastructures: water, sewage-treatment and electricity? )

“Seizure and forfeiture of assets derived from, traceable to, or intended to be used for illicit drug trafficking.” (Like the seizure of Iraqi assets? Thieves, that is what you are!)

“Enforcement of the provisions of the Controlled Substances Act as they pertain to the manufacture, distribution, and dispensing of legally produced controlled substances.” (Like high-profit-generating amphetamines, anti-depressants and nerve-soothing drugs which millions upon millions of US citizens consume on a regular basis?)

“Coordination and cooperation with federal, state, and local agencies, and with foreign governments, in programs designed to reduce the availability of illicit abuse-type drugs on the United States market through nonenforcement methods such as crop eradication, crop substitution, and training of foreign officials.”  (Crop eradication while contaminating and poisoning innocent townspeople, children, foetuses and drinking water? You don’t care at all, do you?)

“Responsibility, under the policy guidance of the Secretary of State and U.S. Ambassadors, for all programs associated with drug law enforcement counterparts in foreign countries.” (Yes, policy guidance form the US State Department … the same people who are spreading lies about Venezuela on a continuous basis!)

Not surprisingly, the US government has already retaliated (like spoiled brats) against Chavez’ decision to stop collaborating with the DEA.

A Reuters report published in the usually anti-Chavez Washington Post on August 8, 2005, states:

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/a
rticle/2005/08/08/AR2005080801162.html
The United States is considering punishing Venezuela with sanctions for breaking off work with U.S. anti-drug agents in the world’s top cocaine-exporting region, the State Department said on Monday.”

Punish?

Is Venezuela your child?

Who wants a parent like you anyways?

And … who are you to “punish” others? God?

“Next month, the State Department must by law judge if Venezuela has failed to cooperate in the drug war, a decision that could trigger a range of sanctions including blocking cheap credit for businesses and counternarcotics aid.” (Venezuela does not need your cheap credits. I bet that those credits have strings attached, such as, “on the condition that US-based firms are hired for the contracts.” Venezuela does not need you. You are not the God-sent, know-it-all or be-it-all race!)

“Venezuela, which Washington has sanctioned for failing to combat human trafficking, would then be blacklisted along with countries such as Myanmar. “ (Go ahead and blacklist Venezuela! So what? Almost no world nation, except for England, takes the US government seriously anymore.)

“ ‘Failure to cooperate only benefits narcotraffickers,’ he said.” (No, failure on the part of Venezuela to collaborate with the criminal DEA means less profits for the USA because Venezuela will make sure that substantially fewer drugs pass through Venezuelan territory on their way to the lucrative US market!)

The Vheadline.com article (the one we started with in this article) ends with: “Based on these facts, the President contends that he has decided to annul the agreement with DEA … ‘we are reviewing it and will take decisions … we don’t need the DEA in our war on narco-trafficking.’ ”

Exactly!

And I don’t think that Chavez is losing much sleep over the USA’s intent at “punishing” Venezuela. If people in the USA only knew what coca growers think (but won’t say) about the USA! Meanwhile, I have this to say to the DEA:

Yankees go home … and stay home!

Oscar Heck
mailto:oscar@vheadline.com

Main Index >> Venezuela Index >> Media Index