|News and opinions on situation in the Middle East|
|16/01/04||The USS Liberty, the story that refuses to die|
i'n'i has covered the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 during the Israeli attack on Eygpt before. Below are a number of essays that reveal much about the way the US government has covered up the attack in intervening years.
----- Original Message -----
Thank you for sending the Admiral Moorer article (in full print out) to me as I had seen the link for it and included it at the end of t he following email which I had sent out last night (which also included the full version of the AP article by Barry Schweid). You having the article open and easy to look it in the email reminded me of it as I was then able to email it to press contacts who are currently working on deadline for their articles on that USS Liberty panel discussion and similar from Monday… I am very glad (and fortunate) to be in touch with like minded American patriots like you, Steve and others.. The national media not even addressing what Admiral Moorer wrote in that article (included below in full as well) shows just how corrupted our great country is by the Zionists….
I am so very glad as well that I was able to light the fire to get that Captain Boston declaration to the USS Liberty discussion panel before it took place at the State Department this past Monday.. I also faxed/emailed a copy of Captain Boston’s declaration to James Bamford who told me that he would mention (after I mentioned that I had sent it the State Department but doubted that they would even mention discuss it during the panel, and they didn’t). So I decided to send it to Bamford last Sunday (before the panel discussion on Monday), but I never expected him to read it during the panel like he did (an unsigned copy of the declaration is also included below). Bamford reading the declaration like he did during the USS Liberty panel discussion is what created most of the major press/media coverage that was in favor of the USS Liberty cause (of getting out the truth of the cover-up to Americans)… I had pressured C-SPAN to cover it, and C-SPAN 2 did (others very kindly and helpfully pressured as well via email as I mentioned for C-SPAN to cover it during a call into the ‘Washington Journal’ last Friday).
The USS Liberty, attacked by Israel, resurfaces on Washington
By BARRY SCHWEID .c The Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) – Reviewing documents covering 36 years, amid a lack of consensus, a State Department official concluded Monday that Israel’s attack on the U.S. spy ship Liberty during the 1967 Six Day War was an act of Israeli negligence.
The United States also was negligent, the official maintained, for failing to notify Israel that the electronic intelligence-gathering ship was cruising international waters off the Egyptian coast and for failing to withdraw the Liberty from the war zone.
A daylong conference that studied fresh documents as well as the established record failed to produce a consensus for any of three views voiced most often: Israel intentionally attacked what it knew to be a ship of the U.S. Navy, the attack was accidental, or the attack resulted from faulty judgment.
Thirty-four Americans were killed in the June 8, 1967, attack, and more than 170 were wounded.
Israel long has maintained that the attack was a case of mistaken identity, an explanation the Johnson administration did not challenge formally. Israel said its forces thought the Liberty was an Egyptian horse carrier, apologized to the United States and paid almost $13 million in compensation, some to victims or their families.
Since the United States did not intercept the order to attack the ship with cannon fire and napalm, precise facts of the attack remain elusive, the State Department official said Monday, speaking on condition of anonymity.
He called the Israeli attack and the U.S. actions a classic example of Murphy’s law: ``If anything can go wrong, it will.’’
David Hatch, a technical director at the National Security Agency, said, ``The good news is that information long sought by researchers is now out, and the bad news is that it does not settle it.’’
The occasion for the State Department conference was the release of historical documents about the 1967 war in which Israel defeated the combined forces of Egypt, Syria, Jordan and other Arab countries in six days.
Charles Smith, a professor at the University of Arizona, said in his presentation that Israel should have known the Liberty was an American ship.
``If they didn’t know, they didn’t try hard enough to find out,’’ he said.
James Bamford, an investigative journalist who has written about the incident, demanded further investigation ``instead of people getting up here and giving their opinions.’’
``There were cover-ups,’’ Bamford said, citing a signed affidavit by retired Navy Capt. Ward Boston, who was a leader of a military investigation into the incident.
Boston said in the affidavit in October that then-President Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara had told those heading the Navy’s inquiry to ``conclude that the attack was a case of `mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.’’
Boston, 80, who did not attend Monday’s conference, said the Navy investigators were given only one week but still were able to amass ``a vast amount of evidence, including heartbreaking testimony from young survivors.’’
Accusing Israel of a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and kill its crew, Boston said in a legal declaration in Coronado, Calif., that he was certain the Israel pilots knew the Liberty, which clearly displayed American flags and had markings in English instead of Arabic, was a U.S. Navy ship.
Additionally, Boston said, ``Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned three lifeboats that that had been launched in an attempt by the crew to save the most seriously wounded – a war crime.’’
Jay Cristol, a U.S. bankruptcy court judge who has written about the incident, cited the finding of the Navy’s inquiry as proof the attack was a mistake. ``There was no indication they had any knowledge they were attacking a U.S. ship,’’ Cristol told the conference.
If the attack were deliberate, its motivation remains uncertain.
Adm. Thomas Moorer, a former chief of naval operations and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote in a memorandum on June 8, 1997, the 30th anniversary of the attack, that Israel deliberately attacked to hide its intentions in the war.
``I am confident that Israel knew the Liberty could intercept radio messages from all parties and potential parties to the ongoing war, then in its fourth day, and that Israel was preparing to seize the Golan Heights from Syria despite President Johnson’s known opposition to such a move,’’ Moorer wrote.
``I believe (then-Israeli Defense Minister) Moshe Dayan concluded that he could prevent Washington from becoming aware of what Israel was up to by destroying the primary source of acquiring that information, the USS Liberty.’’ Israel took the strategic Syrian territory and still holds it 37 years later.
01/12/04 21:18 EST
Tempers flare over US spy-ship inquiry By Guy Dinmore in Washington
Published: January 12 2004 23:14 | Last Updated: January 12 2004 23:14
Survivors of one of the most hotly disputed incidents in American military history – the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty spy-ship in 1967 – on Monday accused the US authorities, past and present, of a cover-up in backing Israeli claims that it was a tragic mistake.
Emotions boiled over in the basement of the State Department as the Office of the Historian opened a public conference on the six-day Arab-Israeli war with heated debate over newly released intercepts from the archives of the secretive National Security Agency.
Most of the basic facts are undisputed. On June 8 1967, Israeli aircraft and later torpedo boats struck the Liberty just off the Mediterranean coast, killing 34 crew and wounding 172. The ship, one of the world’s most sophisticated listening vessels but only lightly armed, limped into port.
From there the controversy begins. An immediate US Navy court of inquiry backed the Israeli claim that it had been mistaken for an Egyptian warship. The US accepted $12m (?9.4m, £6.5m) in compensation.
While some historians have accepted this, survivors and a varied group of academics and former military officials insist the attack was deliberate.
“You’re trying to whitewash it,” one survivor shouted from the audience as Marc Susser, the State Department’s historian, acted as moderator and sought to keep order, refusing to allow speeches from the floor. Even debate on the panel of invited historians descended into acrimony with one contributor accused of being an Israeli agent.
Two recent developments added fuel to the controversy.
Last week Ward Boston, a naval captain who acted as senior legal counsel for the Navy’s court of inquiry in 1967, signed an affidavit declaring that the late Admiral Isaac Kidd, president of the court, had told him that President Lyndon Johnson and Robert McNamara, defence secretary, had ordered a cover-up.
And on Monday, David Hatch, the National Security Agency’s own historian, elaborated on the recently declassified NSA material, the first time the eavesdropping agency had released real voice intercepts.
Mr Hatch confessed that the information “doesn’t settle much”. But his analysis of the conversations between an Israeli air controller and two helicopter pilots “suggested strongly” that the Israelis did not know at first they were attacking a US vessel, although there was mention of a US flag flying.
He also regretted that the new NSA material did not clarify why the Liberty had not received orders sent to it to leave a war zone.
Joseph Lentini, a survivor who has spent the past 36 years researching the tragedy, told reporters he remained convinced that the attack was deliberate.
He admits it is hard to understand why the Israelis would want to sink a ship of its closest ally at a time of war. Conspiracy theories abound.
The most important section of the following article is near the end where it is conveyed that James Bamford read Captain Ward Boston’s declaration (it mentioned that Admiral Kidd thought that A. Jay Cristol was an Israeli agent):
Here is a copy of the declaration (Bamford read a signed copy by Captain Ward Boston) which James Bamford read during the USS Liberty attack panel discussion which was broadcast live on C-SPAN 2 earlier today (hopefully it will repeat as well):
DECLARATION OF WARD BOSTON, JR., CAPTAIN, JAGC, USN (RET.)
I, WARD BOSTON, JR. DO DECLARE THAT THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS TRUE AND COMPLETE:
DATED: JANUARY 8, 2004
Subj: State Department Forum
Attendees should study www.usslibertyinquiry.com and especially www.usslibertyinquiry.com/commentary/cristoltravesty.html.
Cristol’s main crutch is to claim that 13 investigations have all exonerated Israel. That is totally false. NONE has exonerated Israel. See www.ussliberty.org and www.ussliberty.org/wrmead03.htm which looks at the “13 investigations”.
Who is A. Jay Cristol? See www.usslibertyinquiry.com/commentary/travesty/whoiscristol.html
When asked hard questions, Cristol’s standard reply is “Read the book.”
In a message dated 1/14/04 8:35:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, Kmacd@cox.net writes:
Sent from the Internet
Betrayal behind Israeli attack on U.S. ship
Houston Chronicle | Jan. 9, 2004, 6:23PM
After State Department officials and historians assembled in Washington, D.C., last week to discuss the 1967 war in the Middle East, I am compelled to speak out about one of U.S. history’s most shocking cover-ups.
On June 8, 1967, Israel attacked our proud naval ship — the USS Liberty— killing 34 American servicemen and wounding 172. Those men were then betrayed and left to die by our own government.
U.S. military rescue aircraft were recalled, not once, but twice, through direct intervention by the Johnson administration. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s cancellation of the Navy’s attempt to rescue the Liberty, which I personally confirmed from the commanders of the aircraft carriers America and Saratoga, was the most disgraceful act I witnessed in my entire military career.
To add insult to injury, Congress, to this day, has failed to hold formal hearings on Israel’s attack on this American ship. No official investigation of Israel’s attack has ever permitted the testimony of the surviving crew members.
A 1967 investigation by the Navy, upon which all other reports are based, has now been fully discredited as a cover-up by its senior attorney. Capt. Ward Boston, in a sworn affidavit, recently revealed that the court was ordered by the White House to cover up the incident and find that Israel’s attack was “a case of mistaken identity.”
Some distinguished colleagues and I formed an independent commission to investigate the attack on the USS Liberty. After an exhaustive review of previous reports, naval and other military records, including eyewitness testimony from survivors, we recently presented our findings on Capitol Hill. They include:
· Israeli reconnaissance aircraft closely studied the Liberty during an eight-hour period prior to the attack, one flying within 200 feet of the ship. Weather reports confirm the day was clear with unlimited visibility. The Liberty was a clearly marked American ship in international waters, flying an American flag and carrying large U.S. Navy hull letters and numbers on its bow.
Despite claims by Israeli intelligence that they confused the Liberty with a small Egyptian transport, the Liberty was conspicuously different from any vessel in the Egyptian navy. It was the most sophisticated intelligence ship in the world in 1967. With its massive radio antennae, including a large satellite dish, it looked like a large lobster and was one of the most easily identifiable ships afloat.
As a result, our commission concluded that:
What was Israel’s motive in launching this attack? Congress must address this question with full cooperation from the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency and the military intelligence services.
The men of the USS Liberty represented the United States. They were attacked for two hours, causing 70 percent of American casualties, and the eventual loss of our best intelligence ship.
These sailors and Marines were entitled to our best defense. We gave them no defense.
Did our government put Israel’s interests ahead of our own? If so, why? Does our government continue to subordinate American interests to Israeli interests? These are important questions that should be investigated by an independent, fully empowered commission of the American government.
The American people deserve to know the truth about this attack. We must finally shed some light on one of the blackest pages in American naval history. It is a duty we owe not only to the brave men of the USS Liberty, but to every man and woman who is asked to wear the uniform of the United States.
Moorer was chairman of the joint chiefs of staff from 1970 to 1974. He is joined in the independent commission of inquiry by Gen. Ray Davis (recently deceased); Rear Adm. Merlin Staring; former Judge Advocate General of the Navy and Ambassador James Akins.