Before we proceed we must tuck our head under our arm and discard any lingering confidence that our leaders possess any ideological compass that is protective of America's independence and national sovereignty. Our leaders have shown time and time again that they will bargain away our freedoms for their own power bases, wealth and immortal prestige. We have always – and without exception – actively with funding and armed assistance if necessary – to overthrow regimes that for reasons of some sort have come into conflict with the goals of our one-worlders. Take Nicaragua. Through our State Department's Robert White we saw to it that West Point-educated and American ally Antonio Somoza was overthrown (eventually assassinated), and replaced with the Communist Sandinistas. In El Salvador we threw our political weight to the Socialist Duarte by seeing to it pro-American Roberto d'Abuisson was defeated at the polls. d'Abuisson had proclaimed he wanted to form a government as “envisioned by Thomas Jefferson.” Imagine that. No toleration for something like that at the highest levels of our government! No sirree. US journalists have always played the propagandist role for their Insider masters. Take Herb Mathews of the NY Times who agitated editorially for a Fidel Castro victory over Battista. He referred to Castro as the “George Washington of Cuba.” So, we swapped one dictator for an even more vicious one. Four decades for the Cuban people have been our legacy for that unhappy country. Our leaders have no Americanist underpinnings. Their god is power. Their ideologies revolve around themselves and how they and their friends can benefit in so many ways. For Iran, we gave up the pro-American Shah for a maniacal Imam. In South Africa we and our multi-national elites teamed-up to replace de Klerk with the Marxist Mandela. Rhodesia with British duplicity and a chromium embargo was surrendered to Communists. The Belgian Congo fell. Cuban troops occupied Angola. Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) was first given to the Marxist Mobutu, but then displeased, American Insiders saw to it that Mugabe became the head Red. China has been the worst disgrace for American foreign policy and a warning to our few remaining friends – – your days of national sovereignty are numbered. Mao Tse-tung, a readily recognized communist was much preferred over the Christian pro-American Chiang kai Shek.

I could go on and on, but I'm growing weary of recalling all of these American betrayals. It's unsettling. The entire bloc of eastern European countries was surrendered to communism at Yalta. Why on God's earth do Americans continue over and over to trust their leaders to do right by them and their allies? I don't know. Perhaps they're too well educated. Don't America's leaders ever “screw-up” and make a mistake in our favor and for freedom once in a while? You tell me. Betrayal of friends and allies has been the only consistency in America's national leadership for decades.

But now I fear we are to put Venezuela's neck in the noose. For reasons only Chavez knows, he's found himself on the globalist's list for termination. Could it have been his turning to euros for his oil and discarding dollars? I don't know. Iraq did, and look what happened. Do America's leaders and Insiders want control over his oil as they have done in Iraq? The reason isn't ideological as you have seen in the above accounts of preferring communist leaderships over democratic ones among our trading partners. The claims of Bush and his predecessors that they are striving for “democracy”, “liberty”, and “independence” are for American voter consumption, and have no place in the vocabulary of Worldgovspeak that these traitors use amongst themselves.

One thing is dead certain – – the campaign against Venezuela has C-O-U-N-C-I-L on F-O-R-E-I-G-N R-E-L-A-T-I-O-N-S footprints all over it. Take this one article from a pro-communist web site supportive of Chavez http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/articles.php?artno=1027. In the article author Wilpert correctly identifies the source of disruption to Venezuela's political structure. He is apparently unaware that all the American agitators meddling in Venezuelan affairs are members of the CFR. Linda Robinson, the journalist who wrote the article he dissects for inaccuracies and disinformation is a solid CFR member; as is US Army General of the Southern Command James T. Hill, and Joint Chiefs of Staff General Richard Myers. Look at the corporate membership roster of the much despised Council of the Americas (COA): http://www.counciloftheamericas.org/coa/membersnetwork/members1.html. Where do our companies have the right to interfere with a foreign government? Chavez is a problem for Venezuelans, not JP Morgan or Citibank!

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) which disgusted journalist Wilpert is another thoroughly CFR appendage. See Ron Paul's description of same: http://www.antiwar.com/paul/paul79.html. When Jimmy Carter and his www.cartercenter.org/default.asp?bFlash=True CarterCenter are in cahoots with the OAS and agitating in Venezuela then you just know we'll be on the losing side of any 'solution'! Fortunately, the target governments have yet to figure out the real source of their torment is the CFR.

For right now Chavez is a “bad” Communist, and the Red Chinese are “good” Communists. That could change if Chavez begins to see the light and plays ball with the Establishment. But don't count on it; the globalists may be running out of time – – and OIL. The message should be clear to all citizens in South America still free that they must band together forming a coalition of mutual defense independent of US Government interference and domination. Your sovereignty depends on it.

— Charleston Voice

Also:
www.csmonitor.com/2004/0308/p07s01-woam.htm After Haiti, Venezuela is wary of US interference