Prepared by Dr. Steve Niva; Member of the Faculty, Middle East Studies, The Evergreen State College; sent by Cindy Corrie via the Olympia Movement for Justice & Peace listserv.

1.  There seems to be a massive upsurge in violence in Gaza these past few days; what is happening?

The violence is completely one-sided.  On the one side, Israel is conducting an extraordinarily violent military operation into the Northern Gaza Strip that includes ground forces, bombings and missile-strikes in crowded residential neighborhoods.  It has also fired upon ambulances and destroyed many civilian homes.  On Saturday (March 1), Israeli operations killed over 60 Palestinians, some of them were reported to be Hamas fighters and at least half of them were civilians, including 10 children and three women.  Since Wednesday (February 27) the Israeli assault has killed around 80 people and injured over 150.  Israel claims this is only the first phase of the operation; the next phase will involve more ground troops.

On the other side, Palestinian rocket fire on Israel from Gaza killed one Israeli and injured scores of others and two Israeli soldiers have been killed in this operation.

2.  Israel claims that its actions are defensive and necessary to end Palestinian rocket fire into Israel that kills Israeli civilians.  Doesn’t Israel have the right to defend itself?

Palestinian rocket attacks from Gaza killed one Israeli citizen last week in addition to scores of longer range missiles fired on a major city (Ashkelon) and have killed over 15 Israelis and wounded hundreds more since 2001. Palestinian rocket attacks contravene international law and should stop immediately.

However, there are many ways a country can defend itself and Israel’s current military operation is completely unjustified for two main reasons.

First, Israel’s actions themselves are war-crimes.  Attacks on residential areas (Gaza is one of the most crowded areas in the world) and the targeting of civilians, including homes and medical teams, represent war crimes according to the provisions of international humanitarian law. The use of disproportionate and lethal force against a civilian population even in response to the unlawful rocket attacks carried out by Palestinian armed groups is a blatant violation of the laws of war, enshrined in customary international humanitarian law and the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Second, if Israel’s goal is to end rocket attacks from Gaza, the most logical and beneficial step it could take would be to respond positively to Hamas’ repeated cease-fire proposals for a complete end to rocket fire on Israel, most recently, on February 23rd, when Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said that Hamas will consider any initiative that will bring about a ceasefire. Hamas claims it has secured the agreement of all factions to halt rocket fire and promised to impose the cease-fire provided that Israel reciprocates.  Israel’s Prime Miniser Ehud Olmert immediately rejected the cease-fire offer, even though a growing number of Israeli politicians and security officials are calling for Israel to accept a cease-fire.  Israel’s current operations are clearly about much more than securing Israeli civilians lives.  Israel could easily end the rocket fire by accepting a cease-fire.

3. What would a cease-fire include?

Hamas has proposed a cease-fire many times and has been clear that it would have to include a cessation of all hostilities:  Hamas would cease and impose a halt to all rockets and mortar shells from Gaza provided Israel would end its “targeted liquidations”, military incursions and its siege of Gaza.  The negotiations should be conducted by Egypt, particularly since it would have to open the border between the Gaza Strip and Sinai to end the siege of Gaza and give it back its freedom of communication with the world by land, sea and air. 

4. But how can one reach a cease-fire settlement with a violent organization that declares that it will never recognize Israel?

Israel’s demand that it cannot negotiate a cease-fire because Hamas does not “recognize Israel’s right to exist” is nothing more than a pretext for avoiding an end to violence on anything other than Israel’s terms.  Even though Hamas has been responsible for many reprehensible and violent attacks on Israel, it is the main power in Gaza and has a track record of living up to its agreements.  The claim about recognition is faulty for the following reasons:

·         First, the lack of recognition has never stopped states from negotiating with its adversaries; history is replete with negotiations between sworn enemies.
·         Second, such recognition is traditionally reciprocal; in order for Israel to receive recognition it would have to simultaneously recognize the state of Palestine, which it refuses to do.
·         Third, Israel has refused to declare its own borders and is currently in military occupation of another people and has planted massive settlement colonies on their land, both in violation of international law, so which state and which borders are supposed to be recognized?
·         Fourth, and most importantly, in practical terms, if one state or group makes an agreement with another state, then it has recognized that state.  So if Hamas were to agree to a cease-fire, it is meaningless whether or not it has formally recognized Israel because in fact, it has. 

5.  What then are the political reasons why the Israeli government rejects a cease-fire and chooses massive military invasions and violence in Gaza as its preferred policy?

The immediate reason is that the current Israeli government is under severe domestic pressure to take major actions against rocket attacks, and since it will not accept a cease-fire and knows it cannot reoccupy the Gaza strip without major casualties, it is choosing to unleash intense violence upon Palestinians-both fighters and civilians—in order to pressure Hamas to halt rocket attacks.  This is a form of collective punishment; it has never worked in the past and contravenes international law.

The deeper reason Israel chooses violence over a cease-fire is that Israel wants to avoid negotiations with a united Palestinian government that holds firm to basic Palestinian rights to a full and sovereign Palestinian state in the lands occupied by Israel in 1967.  It wants to impose an agreement upon a weakened and divided Palestinian people who could be pushed to accept a deal that allows for Palestinian rule in truncated territorial enclaves under complete Israeli control, with most of the Israeli settlements remaining on Palestinian land.  Dividing Hamas-ruled Gaza from the West Bank and refusing to negotiate any deal with Hamas helps it do this.

6.  But do all Israelis oppose a Cease-Fire?

No.  According to a recent poll, a majority of the Israeli public (64%) support direct talks with Hamas to achieve a mutual ceasefire.  Moreover, Knesset Member Yossi Beilin called for an agreed ceasefire with Hamas; Israel’s public security minister, Avi Dichter, has criticized Israel’s military escalation, saying, “Whoever talks about entering and occupying the Gaza Strip, these are populist ideas which I don’t connect to, and in my opinion, no intelligent person does either.”; and the former head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, Efraim Halevy, calls for Israel and the US to negotiate a ceasefire with Hamas.

7. What should American policy be regarding the situation in Gaza?

The U.S. Government should demand that all attacks in either direction between Gaza and Israel cease now, permanently.  It should support a resolution to that effect in the UN Security Council.  It should pressure Israel to accept a cease-fire

A cease-fire should be welcomed by all who truly want to see the violence stop, the siege of Gaza end, Israeli civilians secure and see a new basis for negotiations that will lead to full political rights for Palestinians according to international law and peace for Israel.  Call for an immediate cease-fire now.

 **  Palestinian Mazin Qumsiyeh traveling with the Wheels of Justice bus tour asks in an email:
Call or write your local editors and radio talk show hosts, and contact your elected representatives in Washington, DC. Help stop these attacks and the blockade on Gaza (LF:contact info below; scores of rabbis, ministers and imans have similarly requested an immediate ceasefire)

President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20500
(202) 456-1414
White House Comment Line: (202) 456-1111
Fax: (202) 456-2461
E-mail: president@whitehouse.gov

E-mail Vice President Dick Cheney: vice.president@whitehouse.gov

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
Department of State
Washing ton, DC 20520
State Department Public Information Line:
(202) 647-6575

Any Senator
U.S. Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-3121

Any Representative
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3121
E-mail Congress: visit the Web site www.congress.org for contact information.

The Israeli Embassy, Washington, DC
(202) 364-5500

The Israeli Embassy, Canada
(613) 567 6450

This is the listserve for the friends of Palestine Solidarity Committee, based in Seattle. You can find out more about PSC by replying to this email address, emailing us at palestinejustice@aol.com, going to www.palestineinformation.org, or by coming to one of our events. We welcome all anti-racists working for justice and human rights all over the world, including Palestine, to work with us. To unsubscribe, please email palestinejustice-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net