|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
‘Ye reap what ye sow’ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were they alive today I wonder what they would make of the resurgence of a world-destroying imperialism that no doubt they thought had had its fangs if not removed then at least blunted. No such luck. No doubt they’d say that it’s because the Soviet Union is no longer around to curb the predations of Capital and there is no doubt that the demise of the USSR has a lot to do with the current state of affairs. Growing up in a world of Mutually Assured Destruction did, at least with a kind of insane logic, create something akin to stability but all the while, underneath, the MADness was gnawing away at what was our utterly false sense of security. There was no way that such a world was sustainable, sooner or later something had to give. And in fact, the world of MADness is directly responsible for the current situation, especially the situation in the Middle East. The Arab world has been the focus of Western interests for well over a century, in the beginning because it was the gateway to Europe’s colonial possessions as well as a prime piece of real estate over which the imperialists fought each other endlessly and of course because of oil, that necessary component without which it could not fight its wars nor maintain its economic superiority. The creation of Israel was central to the strategic objectives of the leading imperialist states, most notably the UK and then the US once it took over the role of the UK in the region. Well, as the bible says ‘ye reap what ye sow’ and the events currently unfolding in the Occupied Territories constitute a real turning point. The Zionist state has created a situation for which there are only two options open to it. Either it follows through with its decades-long objective of totally erasing what’s left of the Palestinian state and its people or it has to come to terms with the reality it has created.
Ultimately, the actions of the Olmert government have revealed the total bankruptcy not only of the ‘two-state solution’ but of a state based on the notion of the ‘Jewish race’, itself a complete fiction. In reality the ‘two-state solution’ was never a possibility even if the Zionist state actually intended to honour its agreements, there is simply no basis for a viable Palestinian state, the Zionists have made sure of that. And in any case, they never intended that a viable Palestinian state would be created, every action since 1948 confirms this.
How else does one explain the media’s treatment of the Palestinians except by the fact that institutionally, it is racist to its core. Take for example, the short piece in today’s Independent (6/7/06), the story relegated to page 22, which has absolutely nothing to say about the situation of the Palestinian people. It doesn’t mention the fact that thousands of artillery rounds have been fired into Gaza, nor does it mention the comments by Zeev Boim quoted above. Aside from quoting a Hamas official, the Palestinians are entirely missing from the story, it’s as if they don’t exist except as a threat to Israel. The story’s title “Israel intensifies Gaza offensive after second rocket attack” says it all. The Palestinians fire a couple of totally ineffectual Qassam rockets which land harmlessly somewhere; the Israeli response is tanks, helicopter gunship attacks and threats to destroy yet more “institutions and infrastructure facilitating terrorism”, as if there’s anything left to destroy. The BBC, in what it laughingly calls an “analysis” has this to say of Palestinian resistance to occupation
No mention of any lessons that the Israelis could learn from the use of (overwhelming) force. Indeed, the entire ‘analysis’ presupposes two equal forces ranged up against each other. In a bizarre twist of language the BBC continues
Thus the BBC nails its colours to the mast when it tells its readers
Doomed? I should say so but not for the reasons the BBC states. The piece continues
Where is the ‘analysis’ which shows that the Israelis have no intention of sharing anything with the Palestinians? This is the lesson the Palestinians have learned over the past 56 years. So insidious is the nature of the propaganda put out by the MSM that the real message is buried inside what passes for news and analysis. Thus the BBC ignores entirely the simple fact that the world’s fourth largest army, equipped by the United States with the latest weapons of mass destruction including nuclear weapons is placed on par with an entirely defenceless population. The BBC’s ideological position is to present to an audience denied the real facts, a ‘plague on both your houses’ argument, that’s the reason the BBC uses the “doomed” message and reinforces it endlessly with a ‘tit-for-tat’ alleged analysis which ignores the simple reality that the Palestinians were driven from their land in 1948 and have been kept in virutal slavery and exile ever since. The propaganda works because it exists within a culture of racism which views the Palestinians as less than human, so when a Palestinian ‘suicide bomber’ blows up a restaurant or a bus, they are immediately labeled as “beasts” and “fanatics”.
The BBC talks of the only power station in Gaza being “attacked”, neglecting to remind the reader that it is the only source of power for 750,000 people, for hospitals, for clean water, for sewage treatment. The Independent described the destruction of the power plant as “cutting off Gaza’s power plant” (editorial, 3/7/06). It is simply not permitted to talk of Israelis as terrorists or psychopaths, this would be ‘anti-semitic’, let alone that they are practicing genocide on par with the Nazis, just as systematic and carefully planned as the ‘Final Solution’. Most of all, what is simply not allowed to be raised as a real issue is a single state solution, which given that the Israelis have made sure the ‘two-state solution’ is a non-starter, is the only way to resolve what the BBC describes as
Yet, a single state is now the only solution open as impossible as it may appear at the moment. The problem with a single state solution for the BBC and the other mouthpieces for the West is that it calls into question the entire rationale for the state of Israel’s existence, a state based on fanatical, religious and racial fundamentalism (sound familiar?). A fanatical state but one run by white, Europeans that echoes Hitler’s ‘uber mensch’. Indeed, much of the fundamental ideology is lifted directly from the Nazi doctrines of the 1930s. So it seems Muslims (or Arabs) have no monopoly on fanatical fundamentalism. To challenge the nature of Israel is to open a can of worms that inevitably calls into question the entire rationale for the ‘war on terror’, the ‘clash of civilisations’ and all the other propaganda being shoveled out 24/7. It would expose the fundamentally racist nature of the entire Western enterprise they like to call ‘civilisation’. So as far as the US and the UK are concerned,
See also: "Arabs Out!" Ynet News 6/7/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|